Feed on
Posts
Comments

Over the last year I’ve vacillated between buying another genealogy program and continuing to use iFamily For Leopard–it was called iFamily For Tiger when I purchased it.  There are a number of reasons to continue with iFamily, most of which I have mentioned in previous posts but a rather special feature of the software was lost with the passing of Keith Wilson, the software’s developer and chief advocate.  Keith was almost omnipresent on the iFamily forum with quick responses to questions and uncanny with his rapid delivery of fixes to any issues which arose with the software itself.  The high profile that Keith set would be difficult, if not impossible, for successive developers to maintain; however, even granting a less herculean stature for the next developer to step into the breach as iFamily’s architect, the once bright future of the software seems much dimmer and less certain.  Perhaps, the most annoying aspect of iFamily’s development is the lack of communication regarding that development.  The developer’s deafening silence in the forum fuels the doubt that iFamily is being actively developed.

With the uncertainty of iFamily’s future as an actively developed genealogy program becoming a greater possibility, I downloaded Reunion 9 as an option should I decide to make a change.  Reunion enjoys a large following of active and devoted users as well as being cited by many genealogists as the premier genealogy program for Mac.  The Reunion forums, at first glance, seem to be very active, responsive, and helpful both regarding the specifics of using Reunion and diverse topics involved in genealogy itself.  When technical issues need to be vetted the developers post on the forum as well.

While I am more than disappointed with the way progress on iFamily has unfolded, there are several reasons for not abandoning iFamily for Reunion 9 immediately.  I find iFamily’s interface more aesthetically pleasing to me than Reunion which may be attributed to the fact that I have used iFamily for a few years now.  I prefer iFamily’s generated HTML for web sites to the web cards that Reunion outputs.  I do find that Reunion’s documentation is a strength that iFamily would profit from if it were incorporated into its development regime, in fact, iFamily’s lack of adequate and readily available documentation is a glaring flaw despite the archived Q & A’s, and FAQ’s on its forum boards.  Price is another factor since Reunion 9 is three times as expensive as iFamily; however, if a program is no longer actively developed, the issue of price becomes moot.  I am not a seasoned genealogist so I found iFamily’s evolving nature to my own personal tastes; with Keith gone, that approach may no longer be possible or viable.

Reunion doesn’t offer limited GEDCOM file importing in its demo version which is very troubling as I would like to test the software with my own data rather than rely on the Royal Family or manually key in data.  I have discovered from Reunion’s various online forums that unlinked sources are not transferred into Reunion when a GEDCOM file is imported which has prompted me to recheck my iFamily data should I take the plunge and switch to Reunion 9.  Reunion has been around for a long time and its future as a Mac only genealogy program appears to be secure.  There is an old adage that a leopard cannot change its spots but I am willing to be patient for a little longer in hope that a snow leopard will–or at least until I can get a proper GEDCOM file prepared to export/import.

Constructing A New Colossus

I’m not sounding a call for the legal profession although such an alert might be warranted.  No, my dismay is with our elected representatives in Congress and with the usual obtuse behavior we American Yahoos so energetically embrace.  We spend so much time and energy posturing how important health and education are to us as individuals and as a nation; however, our actions betray our true intentions: the tyranny of appearance–shallow and superficial–in whose thrall we remain.

If a health care bill is signed into law and does not include the popularly dubbed public option, we may well have to edit The New Colossushuddled masses cower with the tired, poor, the wretched refuse crumbling from foreclosures, the homeless, and the tempest tossed abandoned and alone beside a darkened door.  So soon have bankers, hedge fund managers, the rank and file of financial investment firms returned to their old practices: bonuses as entitlement, excessive profit taking and the resumption of the use of derivatives, which are still unregulated despite the governments best pantomime of posturing to the contrary; the stigma of greed has become once again a badge of honor–at least among certain classes of thieves– while men of power opine and do nothing except hint that somewhere, somehow, they will staunch the flow of executive bonuses.

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan continue, almost as persistent as the practice of bloodletting, which finally faded from our lexicon of medical treatments after an ignominious run of 2000 years.  Want money for health care?  Withdraw our troops from Iraq and Afghanistan–it is a given that we should not send more.  We have a splendid history of supporting corrupt governments: Saddam Hussein, Musharif, Karzai, Reza Pahlavi, Fugencio Batista.  How can we ever doubt our leaders’ perspicacity to evaluate the motives of foreign governments when there are such fine skills exemplified by our own beloved W looked into Putin’s soul and thought he saw the heart of the man but unfortunately we learned later that it was only a reflection of Dick Cheney.  Sadly, the rubric now being bandied about is that any decisions regarding Afghanistan will be determined, at least in part, by the outcome of the run-off vote following an egregiously corrupt election orchestrated by the even more egregiously corrupt Karzai family and its hegemony of cohorts.  Every drop of blood is precious regardless of national origin; however, our actions suggest that we are willing to sacrifice our way of life and values to maintain the façade of a democratically elected government in Afghanistan.

Following our government’s policy in Afghanistan, it should come as no surprise that the same indifference is manifested in the area of healthcare and education.  Certain members of Congress pontificate about the pitfalls of the government’s involvement in the administration of healthcare insurance yet none decline the healthcare our tax dollars purchase for them–As far as I am aware no one has volunteered to pay for their own insurance–it comes with the work, if you are lucky enough to get it!  There is no ignominy in broadcasting misleading advertisements sponsored by private insurance companies or the conspicuous and unrelenting pressure powerful lobbyists exert upon every elected official at every level of government.

Less becomes the new more, especially in education.  Titillation has supplanted effort reducing learning to a state of tingling and jangling nerves.  Everyone succeeds, in his own mind; however, all too frequently, failure is a matter of national tragedy.  The success of Plato’s Republic was based upon a noble lie about our fundamental nature, the categories into which each of us are bound.  Whether we repair our aging Republic or build a new one, perhaps we will reveal our true selves by our penchant for or our aversion to deception regardless of its lineage.

Buying Local? Caveat Emptor

The predominate community mantra these days is:  Buy Local.  Taken at face value, this injunction seems to be a reasonable way both to engage and stimulate local businesses; however, as with all issues, the devil is very often in the details.  Approximately eight years ago I contracted with a local home maintenance company, Pike’s, to install vinyl siding and replacement windows in my home.  I decided it was time for me to join the legions of homeowners who had tired of scaling ladders and scaffolding to prepare and to paint the exterior of their houses.  Along with installing premium siding from Alcoa we had ten windows replaced with premium virgin, vinyl windows that were double pane with argon gas to reduce the harshness of the sun’s rays, etc.  We also had all of our gutting and downspouts replaced along with the waterfall gutter guards and some minor flashing work around a bay window area where we had already installed custom made Andersen windows.  The installation went smoothly enough with only one rough spot–one of the windows had a defect and didn’t work properly.  The defective window was quickly replaced which was reassuring considering the check I had written to have the work done.

A couple of years ago or so I had an issue regarding a section of vinyl siding.  I contacted the company to have someone come out, inspect the situation, and repair or recommend what needed to be done–all of the materials were warranted for life.  Perhaps it was an oversight or maybe scheduling was really a problem, but I got no response until I wrote a letter to the owner, who, by the way never responded although a “supervisor” eventually appeared and grudgingly made some adjustments to the siding.  While he was on site he regaled me with anecdotes of the incompetence of the installers who worked for the company years ago, when the work was done on my house.  Unfortunately, there was some truth in his tale as I was informed later by an official from Duke Power of a code violation because there was vinyl siding covering the electrical service where it attaches to the house and connects to the meter.

A little more than two months ago, while my wife and I were cleaning the windows, we noticed a problem with one of the windows.  The problem is that the part of the window where the sash attaches to it has come detached from the window and remains at the bottom of the track when the window is raised.  So I called Pike’s and described the situation with the window.  I was greeted with what appeared to me was the usual truculent, defensive maneuver that so many companies resort to instead of simply ascertaining what the problem is and how it can be resolved.  After a considerable amount of time explaining, then establishing that I was a customer, etc., I was transferred to a another person in the company.  I repeated what I had told to the first person–I confess that my explanation may not have captured the problem as clearly as either I or the company representative would have liked–and suggested that it would be best if someone came out and inspected the window.  A date was set, an estimator arrived as scheduled, looked at the window, declared it a manufacturing defect, stated that his company no longer had that window, etc.  Defense again.  I produced my invoice from the installation and the records associated with it, which he reviewed.  I told him I wanted the window repaired or replaced.  Interestingly, when the estimator first looked at the windows he remarked that they were in really good shape!  I thought it odd that he would expect them to be in any other condition.  I’m not in the habit of destroying that which I have worked hard to afford!  At any rate, he told me that he would research the manufacturer of the windows and contact me in about two weeks.

Two weeks became two months.  I called Pike’s to find out the status regarding the problem with my window.  Once again I had to jump through hoops until I became just a bit warm under the collar and probably upped the decibel level of my voice whereupon I was handed off to another person who was considerably more adroit at recognizing there was such a thing as a customer and customers pay the bills.  Apologies all around and excepted.  I get transferred to the guy who came out to inspect my window; he tells me as others have told me that there was a miscommunication–of course there is always a miscommunication, remember Cool Hand Luke: When Strother Martin defines life’s biggest problem for Paul Newman!  What we have here is a failure to communicate! He says he will call me once he verifies the manufacturer of the windows, etc.  I’m told the company that manufactured my windows was sold about two years ago to another company.  Fine, just gather all the pertinent information and get back to me. I give him my cell number in addition to the land line so that he can call me at any time.  I get a call on my cell a day or two later while I am in the middle of something and can’t really talk but suggest that he either call me later or email me the information and I verify that he has my correct email address before I hang up.

A few days later I call the telephone number provided in the email I’ve received.  Ah, the wonders of technology!  Nowadays, all companies virtually guarantee that no customer will ever talk to a sentient being.  After navigating a maze of pre-programmed telephone options, none of which was categorized appropriately for my particular problem, I simply choose one, and then another, until I manage to find a living being to talk to.  All’s well that ends well, but the Bard be forgiven, that cliché is not applicable to my situation although one has to admire the novelty of customer relations:  I was told to Google the series number on the gold label on one of the bottom rails (maybe on the upper half or the bottom half) of my window and that would tell me who manufactured my windows because she was absolutely certain that her company was not the manufacturer.  I felt a sinking feeling come over me like an overweight mastodon strolling through the La Brea tar pits.  Google, despite many who believe that it is the font of all truth, the be-all and end-all of all that is, isn’t, but, I do the search anyway.  No manufacturer, not even close–maybe I should have given Bing a try.  Maybe next time.

So I call Pike’s once again.  I am regaled with menu of automated messages.  There is no live person available despite being informed by one of those messages that the hours during which the business operates coincides precisely with the time my call has been placed.  I leave a voice message.  I send an email.  Now another week has passed.  I suppose that my next step is writing to David Pike once again; however, my last experience seemed less than fruitful, in fact, he seemed to ignore it.  It appears that my only value to Pike’s occurred years ago when I wrote them a check and paid them in full.  Apparently the company was not seeking to build a viable, long-term, community-based, business relationship.  Owning a house is not a static proposition; maintenance and upkeep are constants; roofs need replacing.  Why would any company spurn or discourage paying customers?  Is it arrogance or incompetence?  Even when the economy is blushing with work and ripe with funds ready to be invested in divers of projects, the best businesses–large, small, local, international–will attend to customers rather than disregard them.

One should always carefully scrutinize any business before one enters into a relationship with that business and it is no less axiomatic because that company happens to be locally owned.  We thought we had taken the right step when we decided to support a local business but apparently we were mistaken.  Lifetime warranty is a euphemism if the company which stands behind it is a façade.  I’m not implying that all local businesses are taboo.  As a matter of fact, I think very highly of Talley Water Treatment Company which continues to provide the kind of service and quality that was pivotal in my decision to retain them.  I suffer no delusions that my venting in this blog will repair or replace the defective window; the three people who read this blog probably don’t intend to replace their windows or cover their houses with vinyl siding, but, I hope they’d contact me first if they were considering Pike’s for the job.  The only thing I can say for sure is that I paid for the window once; and, it looks as if I’ll have to pay for it again, only this time it certainly won’t be Pike!

Quagmires And Quotes

While many ultra right wing conservatives may have regarded the election of Barack Obama as president of the United States with foreboding, I did not.  The vote I cast for him was done without equivocation, in fact, it was done with pride and an abiding sense of relief that the highest elective office in the land would be occupied by an individual who was literate, competent, and well-spoken.  After eight years of aberration, malignant officials and malfeasance in governance, the erosion of democracy in this country, and the lack of both the will and the wisdom to shape a viable foreign policy almost any change would have been an improvement–provided that Sarah Palin was not a part of the new administration.  Conservatives feared Obama’s idealism and liberals embraced it but these political adversaries failed to weigh their strategies to accommodate the President’s overarching pragmatism.  Whereas idealism and pragmatism are not mutually exclusive it is important to note that ideals (objectives) be regarded as open-ended and not necessarily absolute.  Obama’s approach very much involves a tool theory of truth which implies a working ethic secured to the notion that what works for the general weal serves to define what is true.  Under this principle it seems likely that a single payer system is in the best interest of the people whereas such an arrangement defeats the continued excessive profits enjoyed by health insurance companies and providers.

The apparent failure of the majority party (can you say Democrat) to guarantee the inclusion of the single payer option in any healthcare legislation brought to the floor unfortunately is both predictable and indicative of the massive buying power of the insurance lobby.  I wish that simply being more self-aware was a solution; perhaps, then, George Santayana’s famous quotation would be appropriate:  Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.  Our elected officials are not unconscious–their motivations are self-driven and only complex because we allow them to be presented as such–but they lack even a whisper of conscience and are devoid of the slightest measure of courage.  We, the people, run from our intellect, flee reason, and embrace ignorance and fear, tremble at the mere mention of loaded words, the shibboleths of definitions: socialism, socialized medicine, government intervention.  We have forsaken individualism, stifled innovation, and surrendered our rights as citizens to corporate and private greed.  A pragmatist runs the risk of becoming ensnared in the open-endedness of his construct of truth especially if what works, works only for the privileged minority.

Santayana also said:  Only the dead have seen the end of the war. George W Bush failed to comprehend the philosopher’s meaning; perhaps, that is a curse that all of our presidents must suffer.   And now, Afghanistan, has become Obama’s albatross.  If only one person had to wear this necklace decorated with the failed charms of opprobrium–war, greed, economic chaos, environmental ruin, a debauched healthcare system, political and social injustice–then the sacrifice might parallel the Christian imagery which mocks us as it hastens our decline.

A pragmatist may stumble bearing the weight of our national character.  As Santayana noted in Character and Opinion in the United StatesYou must wave, you must cheer, you must push with the irresistible crowd; otherwise you will feel like a traitor, a soulless outcast, a deserted ship high and dry on the shore … Perhaps, our president finds himself shipwrecked and in need of a man Friday to bolster his resolve.

Snow Leopards Leaping

When I learned of the unexpected death of Keith Wilson nearly 9 months ago I was shocked.  Keith was not only the developer for  iFamily For Tiger–as it was known when I first became acquainted with and subsequently purchased the software–he was head cheerleader for the product and a passionate genealogist.  The quality of the product attracted me right away but it was Keith’s personal involvement and interaction with the users–through the iFamily forum and email–that was the most instrumental factor in my purchasing iFamily.  We carried on a lively email banter and swapped a few jibes and stories even though a hemisphere separated us.  If there was ever a problem or a question regarding either iFamily or genealogy, Keith was quick to respond, in fact his proaction was astounding, almost rivaling his programming skills.  So Keith’s death struck me as tragic for his family and friends and the project he certainly loved, iFamily.  His death also introduced a level of pessimism in me about the future of iFamily.

Perhaps it is unfair to assume that the best intentions cannot realistically be expected to translate into that which they intend.  Perhaps, but the development of iFamily has been stalled since Keith’s untimely passing and there are no tangible signs that development is ongoing, or, if it may ever be revived.  I had hoped that iFamily’s code base would be taken over by either another individual who was an avid genealogist or by a firm similarly committed to genealogy so that Keith’s efforts would continue to grow and flourish from the fertile foundation he had laid.  Unfortunately, in nearly nine months not one revision has been made to iFamily, not even the last revision Keith had scheduled for release around the end of October 2008.  I am not a software developer and I harbor no secret desire to become one although I had been a programmer for over 20 years (retired); however, there is an implicit professional mandate not to let a viable code base languish; it is not good for business and it certainly is not very considerate of customers who have purchased the product and spent long hours filling its database with genealogical data.  It would be kinder and wiser to announce the end of development for that software.  Situations arise when it becomes necessary to end product development; unfortunately, such casualties are not all uncommon in technology.

While I have hoped that I was mistaken and that my judgment was faulty, action or inaction seems to confirm my doubts.  On June 9 2009 I raised a query in the iFamily forum regarding Apple’s newest operating system, OS X 10.6, dubbed Snow Leopard, and compatibility issues, if any, with iFamily.  It was said that there were no expectations for any conflict or problems for iFamily running under Snow Leopard.  Sadly there are: iFamily does not run under SL.  Apparently, iFamily was never tested by the developer to confirm that it would or would not run under OS X 10.6.  The developers of Reunion 9 did test their software and issued a warning prior to the release of Snow Leopard so that the users would know in advance that upgrading the OS would cause Reunion to fail.  Meanwhile, they are working to release an upgrade to address the problems which they have identified.

My personal preference is to continue to use iFamily as my primary genealogy program and I am willing to be patient for the short term as long as there is a definite commitment made to the active development of iFamily and not long periods of inactivity and promises which go unmet.  One of the realities involving of computers is that operating systems will continue to improve and change.  Developers have an obligation to keep abreast of, and, in some cases, ahead of the sharp technology curve that these improvements promise if they want their products to remain viable.  I hope that coding issues with iFamily and Snow Leopard will be resolved in a reasonable time, on the other hand, I am beginning to take a closer look at Reunion 9 as it appears to have a solid user base and a track record for longevity–not a bad quality when one is involved with genealogy.

Older Posts »

Bad Behavior has blocked 350 access attempts in the last 7 days.